065 Pubmed vs. Google Scholar: A Database Arms Race?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar literature searches.
BACKGROUND Literature searches are essential to evidence-based respiratory care. To conduct literature searches, respiratory therapists rely on search engines to retrieve information, but there is a dearth of literature on the comparative efficiencies of search engines for researching clinical questions in respiratory care. OBJECTIVE To compare PubMed and Google Scholar search results for cli...
متن کاملComparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar.
s6756218Miscellaneous (editorials, letters)17812530Total2,081 2,0531 base and leveraging the database’s functions to pro-mote open access to research.
متن کاملRetrieving Clinical Evidence: A Comparison of PubMed and Google Scholar for Quick Clinical Searches
BACKGROUND Physicians frequently search PubMed for information to guide patient care. More recently, Google Scholar has gained popularity as another freely accessible bibliographic database. OBJECTIVE To compare the performance of searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. METHODS We surveyed nephrologists (kidney specialists) and provided each with a unique clinical question derived from 100 r...
متن کاملComparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.
The evolution of the electronic age has led to the development of numerous medical databases on the World Wide Web, offering search facilities on a particular subject and the ability to perform citation analysis. We compared the content coverage and practical utility of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The official Web pages of the databases were used to extract information o...
متن کاملSAVVY SEARCHING Google Scholar revisited
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to revisit Google Scholar. Design/methodology/approach – This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Google Scholar. Findings – The Google Books project has given a massive and valuable boost to the already rich and diverse content of Google Scholar. The downside of the growth is that significant gaps remain for top ranking journals and serials, a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ Quality & Safety
سال: 2013
ISSN: 2044-5415,2044-5423
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002293.96